Pitbull Myths

pitbull myths

Pitbull myths about Bully pitbulls have acquired a number of unfortunate myths that have been attached to them like a scarlet letter. Parents fear for their children should they stand too close to this dog. Entire towns have banned the breed in fear that the bully would attack the people.

The sensationalist media has assigned this breed the power and viscousness of a supernatural werewolf while ignoring the sins of other dogs. This undeserved reputation has attracted owners of an unsavory character.

Back in the 19th century, the ASPC considered the bulldog to be non-aggressive toward people. It was praised for stability, loyalty and its friendly demeanor. The bulldog was known as a great four-legged companion for children and family.

The pitbulls myths started thanks to media manipulation, the bully pitbulls have assumed the characteristics of an out-of-control attack dog. This undeserved reputation has attracted unsavory people who want a viscous fighting dog or one that looks intimidating while guarding their property. The bulldog’s reputation has also attracted irresponsible breeders.

In fact, people who own vicious, biting dogs, regardless of breed, are more likely to show specific criminal behaviors, according to a Journal of Forensic Science study from 2009. The study related by the Alternet website stated that those who owned mean dogs tended to exhibit specific forms of social instability. In other words, mean, nasty people owned mean, nasty dogs of various breeds. And pitbulls, in particular, were found in homes owned by people who weren’t outstanding citizens. People who are not well socialized will own dogs that are also poorly socialized and probably aggressive. The study concluded that unstable human sociopaths preferred bulldogs because of various false assumptions. Consequently, bullies took an undeserved hit as unstable and aggressive dogs, thus creating more pitbull myths.

This has led to an unfortunate situation where pitbulls are over represented in shelters. Because bully pitbulls carry the stigma of a bad dog, they are next to impossible to find homes for. The trip to the animal shelter is often the last ride they take. They die alone in the shelters, unwanted and unloved.

This is a tragedy because the American Veterinary Medicine Association has tested the bulldog and found this breed to perform above average in temperament, according to Alternet. The association has tested thousands of dogs in order to measure their ability to tell the difference between threatening and non-threatening behavior. They are also tested for aggression and skittishness. Bully pitbulls passed with flying colors, showing an above average temperament. Only the hand-licking golden retriever had a better temperament.

The fearsome bulldog bite turned out to be more pitbull myths created. They don’t own vice-lock jaws. The bulldog bite had less force than the Rottweilers or German shepherds, according to a National Geographic study.

Studies of media stories show that reporters are always looking for scary monsters to write about. In the 19th century, it was bloodhounds, the newspapers depicted as blood-loving fiends. It was written that the poor bloodhound had a taste for human blood. After that myth faded away, the German shepherd and Doberman Pinscher came to the fore as killers. Now, it’s the turn of the bully pitbulls as the latest mean dog.  Creating ye, more pitbull myths.

The media bias against the pitbull was illustrated in a report by the National Canine Research Council. In 2008, two retrievers attacked an Arizona woman, killing her. The attack generated one story. However, when pitbulls attacked and killed a California woman, nearly 300 stories were reported.

The media sensationalism has stirred up reactions against the pitbull around the world. A number of towns and cities have banned ownership of the breed. These people are on the wrong trail by blaming a particular breed rather than the relationships between dogs and people thus, we have many more pitbull myths created.

The ASPCA has released studies that show that there is no correlation between banning dog breeds and the number of dog bites. For example, after Prince George’s County in Maryland banned pitbulls, public safety against dog bites didn’t improve. These prejudicial laws also single out dogs owned by families that have done no harm, forcing those families to destroy or give away a beloved family dog.

It will fall to responsible pitbull owners to challenge the media killer-dog fables and pitbull myths. They will need to confront hostile neighbors and local governments by presenting facts. Breeders must refuse to sell pitbulls to people whose heads aren’t screwed on tight. It will take the effort of the entire bully pitbulls community to protect their friends from unwarranted smears and attacks. Pitbulls can’t do it themselves. They’re just dogs.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *